• Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn
  • Redux
  • Flickr
  • RSS
Kennedy Space Center

STS-120, my first space launch

Crowd viewing the STS-120 launch at the KSC VIP siteTwo years ago today, on October 23, 2007, I earned my space enthusiast wings: I viewed the launch of the STS-120 Shuttle mission at Kennedy Space Center.

It all started in late July when ESA astronaut and STS-120 crew member Paolo Nespoli, of Italian nationality, invited some friends and me to view his launch at KSC. We had met him in previous years, when he took part to outreach events at the planetarium of Milan, the largest in Italy, for which we work. He was also going to fly a small flag with our planetarium logo onboard Discovery (item 70 in the STS-120 Official Flight Kit Manifest).

When Nespoli invited us, we carefully and thoroughly evaluated our schedules, considered all issues, thought “yeah, after all, somebody has got to do it, why not?”, and finally accepted. The whole process took approximately 0.0012 seconds, possibly less.

As Nespoli’s guests, we took part to ESA’s official events together with his family and friends such as a KSC tour, briefings and dinners. I kept reading on license plates that Florida is the sunshine state, but the sky told a different, rainy story up to the day before launch. And a friend’s experiences reminded something important about Shuttle launch schedules: he tried to view several launches at KSC over a period of a dozen years, but was never
successful due to scrubs.

This was our first launch, and it didn’t disappoint. Florida turned out to indeed be the sunshine state.

Launch day was awesome, from both a weather and an emotional point of view. We viewed the launch from the Banana Creek VIP site next to the Saturn V Center. Sitting behind me on the viewing stands there was a retired Grumman employee who worked on the Apollo LM. A NASA photographer caught me in awe in the image above (I’m the one at right), which is a small portion of a larger photo (original NASA story).

The launch was a rich sensory and emotional experience. Pictures and videos are just not enough, you have to be there.

What surprised me most is what happened at launch and later. As a space enthusiast, you are familiar with the typical succession of scene cuts of Shuttle launches seen on NASA TV. But when you are there, you have to be your own director and quickly — very quickly — learn to use your eyes to view a completely new scene with a much wider field of view and rich, vivid stimuli.

My trip to Florida was made even more unforgettable by other experiences. A group of friends and fellow members of Forumastonautico.it, the largest Italian online space community, had independently organized a trip to KSC for the launch (they got an additional treat, a Delta II launch on October 18, 2007). We had a really great time together.

With the Forumastronautico.it friends we had dinner with Damaris Sarria, a young and enthusiastic engineer who works at KSC and maintains the blog How I Am Becoming An Astronaut. We had interviewed her for AstronautiCAST, Forumastronautico.it’s podcast (original interview in English, MP3 file).

I recently found that space tweep @absolutspacegrl was on console at MCC in Houston for STS-120. And Nespoli’s crew member Scott Parazynski even
joined Twitter as @SPOTScott. I guess @flyingjenny lubed and tuned Discovery’s thrusters for STS-120. Were you also involved in STS-120? Did you view the launch at KSC? Let me know in the comments.

After STS-120, Nespoli was assigned to the Expedition 26/27 crew currently scheduled for launch in November 2010 onboard a Soyuz from Baikonur.
Hmmm… how cool is that (no pun intended)?

Get-there-itis

After
yesterday’s launch scrub for STS-127 due to weather, I was listening in
on some of NASA’s press conference on NASA TV. One of the reporters
asked about the weather criteria, if they were perhaps too strict now
that we have more advanced methods of assessing weather conditions than
we did when the criteria was developed, or something to that effect.

I don’t remember the answer Mike Moses gave, but the question made
me think. While it is very easy to get frustrated over strict weather
criteria when it hinders a launch and the weather is borderline, that
line has to be drawn somewhere. Pilots are all too familiar with the
concept of “get-there-itis,” which is used to describe the affliction
when someone is so fixated on getting where they are going that they
take unnecessary risks to get there. These risks might be with weather,
fatigue, or even mechanical issues.

I remember an experience many years ago as a student pilot flying
with my instructor from Pensacola back home to Tallahassee. We were
flying a 1966 Cessna 150 by VFR or visual flight rules, meaning we were
navigating by sight rather than instruments. The plane was not
certified for instrument flight, so that was our only option. VFR
flight requires certain weather and visibility conditions and we were
okay in Pensacola, but it didn’t look good in the direction we were
heading. We probably shouldn’t have left Pensacola when we did, but we
were anxious to get back so we took off and headed back home.

As we traveled, the clouds went from scattered to not-so-scattered
and by the time we got to Destin (about a quarter of the way home), we
were having to fly so low to stay beneath the ceiling we could
practically read the street signs. Fortunately, we were able to land at
Destin and wait out the weather, but many are not so lucky. So often
the desire to get somewhere overcomes rational decision making, leading
to the pilot’s demise. And pilots are only looking to get home or to
wherever they are going- imagine how much the get-there-itis is
amplified when the destination is a mission to space and people all
over the world are watching expectantly.

Just think- if the weather criteria for launch were not set so
firmly, it would be easy to rationalize launching when weather was just
a little beyond the guidelines.  If that works out without an issue,
then the next time it makes sense to allow weather that is a little
farther out of specifications, and so on. It is a slippery slope.
Without strict criteria, pretty soon we’d find ourselves taking
unnecessary risks. We can’t let get-there-itis cause us to make bad
decisions.

I will admit that launch scrubs frustrate me just as much as
everyone else, and sometimes I want to yell, “Just light it off,
already!” But I also understand the reasoning behind it and that it is
the nature of our industry.  Ultimately, I think everyone would agree
that the safety of the crew is well worth the wait.

Back in the Day… (Chapter One)

Chapter One – Boondocking and the Co-op Rockets

Funny how small events can change your life, make such an indelible impression on you that they guide and shape you for years to come, and how circumstances often alter your dreams and aspirations, leading you in directions you could never have imagined.

Growing up in Inglewood, California, practically under the landing pattern of planes arriving at Los Angeles International Airport, I knew by sight the airliners of the time and the airlines they represented. DC-3’s from United, the beautiful Lockheed Constellation of TWA, the chubby Boeing Stratocruisers of Pan American and the DC-4’s and -6’s of airlines come and gone.

Just a few blocks south of my home on 113th street lay the city of Hawthorne, home of Northrop Aviation. Northrup Field was a favorite bike destination in those days, when as kids we could hope to see strange airplanes land and take off. Planes like the Northrop F-89, one of America’s first jet fighters. And, if truly lucky, we might even catch a glimpse of the most stunning airplane of its day, the magnificent Northrop XB-49 Flying Wing.

I was fortunate to witness a take-off of Jack Northrop’s pride and joy, and I remember it’s near vertical climb, the smoke pouring from the jet engines and the roar. Oh, that incredible roar of power. That night at dinner, I could talk of nothing else. I would become a pilot and fly the Flying Wing. No matter I was a skinny girl with glasses. No matter my parents were poor. Somehow, someday I would fulfill my dreams.

My father was killed during the Second World War, and his legacy to me as a surviving child, was access to a portion of his veteran benefits. Under the provisions of the GI Bill, veterans received a fixed monthly sum of $110 from which they could to pay for their tuition, fees, books, and living expenses in order to go to college. My stepfather worked for the US Post Office and money around our house was tight. Without those GI Bill benefits, college might have been unaffordable. Mom and Dad wanted me to go to a local state college, live at home and use that $110 a month for books and supplies.

I had other ideas!

I wanted to travel, see the world, and I still harbored a secret desire to become a pilot. I wanted to go away to college and to chart my own course. In high school, I became enamored of the sciences, particularly chemistry. Math however, was another story! Thank God I had fingers and toes. But undeterred by small details, I decided I would become a chemist or perhaps a chemical engineer.

New Mexico College of Agriculture and Mechanic Arts, located in Las Cruces, New Mexico had a co-operative program for engineering students offered though the Physical Science Laboratory. PSL entered into its first contract with the Army Ballistics Research Laboratory on May 15, 1946 to supply services to the army at White Sands Proving Ground, the nation’s first test center for rocketry. (http://www.psl.nmsu.edu/about/history.php) Under the “co-op” program, students worked full-time, usually at White Sands and went to school part time for six months of the year. The following six months the students went to school on A& M’s campus full-time and worked part-time. Salaries earned were applied to tuition, room and board, books and other incidentals. I applied and was accepted, first being assigned to an Askania cine-theodolite tracking station at WSPG and later to the microwave propagation branch of the Army’s Electronic Research and Development Agency (ERDA).

Those of us fortunate to work “out on the range” filled our days with a little bit of work and a whole lot of adventure. Being assigned to a tracking station had its merits. If the station did not have a clear angle to photograph the launch or the flight of a missile, the crew “stood down”. One could twiddle one’s thumbs, drink coffee or sit quietly. Most however engaged in the time honored pastime of “Boondocking”. One or two folks would be selected, threatened with bodily injury or even paid, to stay behind at the tracking station to answer the phone on the off chance it rang. It hardly ever did!

The rest would head out into the boonies to get as close as possible to an active launch pad, hunker down and wait for the fireworks to begin. In those early days, when the button was pushed, rockets had a disturbing tendency to blow up! Those that didn’t explode, rarely flew straight and true. Bits of hot metal raining down or an errant flight path, sometime uncomfortably close overhead were always an adventure.

Corporal was a surface to surface artillery weapon and the first designed to be nuclear tipped. I remember a Corporal lifting off on a bright Spring morning, getting maybe fifty feet in the air, slowing nearly to a stop and dancing around on its tail of fire. Several of us were in the same gully and we didn’t know if the bird was going to recover, fall, explode or dance our way prior to its demise. All we knew for sure was that somebody was going to catch a whole lot of grief.

I got up and ran like the wind. Back in high school I was pretty speedy, but a fat little Army Captain, flew by me, huffing and puffing like a steam engine. He disappeared and I knew he had found a deep hole to hide in. I didn’t stop to ask if he wanted company, I just jumped in on top of him! That MGM-5 danced around long enough to put some distance between us and the launch pad and for the Captain and I to find suitable accommodations. When the bird finally blew up, I am sure there were quite a few fricasseed rabbits in the area. We didn’t stop to collect lunch.

One of the more embarrassing failures was precipitated by the launch of a Navy shipboard anti-aircraft missile called TALOS. We often joked that TALOS stood for “try and launch on schedule!” This particular bird launched, dipped low to the ground, about 10 feet as I remember, leveled out and headed up range. About two or three miles out, it changed its mind and turned 180 degrees. It flew hot and straight and true right back over the heads of the launch crew. It impacted quite
close to the Commanding General’s office at Headquarters, digging a substantial hole in the lawn. The entire flight, from beginning to end was faithfully documented by a tracking crew.

Co-op students on work phase were an inventive lot. With few homework assignments the weekends free to head for the Rio Grand and drink beer and we were left plenty of time to get in trouble,

Honest John was a solid fuel missile whose propellant was cast in stick form and then the individual sticks were packed into the missile’s body. These sticks were several feel long and with a shaped cross section about an inch and a half across. Small pieces could be lit with a match.

Not content with lighting and tossing small chunks of “John” fuel at one another, some enterprising soul invented the “Co-op Rocket”. Being long before the days of pop-top beer cans, a can opener, known back in the day as a “church key”, was required. Also needed was a stout nail. A can would be opened and with the contents disposed of (usually down the throat). A second large hole in the top of the can was opened opposite the first. A 16-penny nail was then used to puncture four holes equidistant around the base of the can, about a quarter inch above the bottom. The nail was given a sideways push after the initial penetration. This resulted in an orifice that pointed tangentially away from the axis of the can. The beer can was then filled with shavings of “John” fuel, and when packed fully, was upended on a small stick of fuel that served as an igniter. The fuel would burn, combustion gasses escaped through the two large openings imparting a great amount of thrust. Gasses would also escape through the four small openings and because of their tangential twist, a spin was imparted, thus stabilizing the flight (sometimes). The can would perhaps reach an altitude of three or four hundred feet before exploding!

Coors cans were said to fly the highest and farthest…

Flying the Co-op Rocket did not last long. The FBI got involved when somebody tried to bring a jeep load of Honest John propellant through the front gate and cart it to the college for safekeeping. His defense was the need for further flight tests to perfect the trajectory of the Co-op Rocket. Dorm rooms were searched, miscreants punished and the days of watching Coors cans rise majestically over the Rio Grand river came to an end.

Back in the Day… (Prologue)

They came from cities and towns, large and small. From the plains of
the Midwest and the hollows of Appalachia they came. East Coast, West
Coast and from everywhere between they answered the call.

Some had degrees with an alphabet soup of letters behind their names. Some had high school diplomas, some not even that.

Engineers, scientists, welders and pipe fitters, carpenters and chemists swelled the ranks…

They answered the call and the challenge issued by a young and charismatic President of the United States.

In a special address to Congress on May 25, 1961, President John Fitzgerald Kennedy stated:

“…I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the
goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and
returning him safely to the Earth.”

And at Rice University in 1962 he reaffirmed his commitment to lead
this nation to preeminence in the manned exploration of space. He said:

“We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this
decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because
they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the
best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we
are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which
we intend to win…”

Some of us came from the aircraft industry, North American Aviation
in Los Angeles, McDonnell in St. Louis, Douglas Aircraft, Boeing and
Bell and Grumman on Long Island. Some from Chrysler and Bendix, others
from TWA and Pan Am, we were contractors and subcontractors and
employees of mom and pop companies, all part of the quest to put a man
on the moon and return him safely to earth.

We came from small towns with unfamiliar names, Seal Beach and
Huntington Beach in California; from Las Cruces, New Mexico, from and
Huntsville, Alabama and Bay St. Louis in Mississippi.

We all had two things in common. We were all committed JFK’s dream
and we all worked at the Cape during the wonderful days that were
Project Apollo. There are few of us left anymore and there will be
fewer still when we next set foot on the moon.
Sara Marshall on her wonderful website, www.insidetheapolloproject.com,
says, “Remember, the astronauts have the right stuff, but we engineers
have the REAL stuff”. So true! And everyone had a role to play.

We were the guys and gals, the “grunts” in the trenches so to speak,
who did the heavy lifting, and who made things work. We solved the
problems, wrote the equations and trod unfamiliar ground.

We flew the Saturn V

This is our story…